The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program continues to be in a state of flux. Announced in 2012 by President Obama, the policy grants a deferral from deportation for two years to some immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children. After two years, recipients can seek a renewal provided they have no serious misdemeanors or felonies. To date, the program has protected around 700,000 people from deportation. However, two recent court cases have rendered the future of DACA less clear.
Just last week, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. ordered that the Trump administration cannot close down the DACA program. Going even farther, the judge ordered that the government begin accepting new DACA applicants.
Judge John Bates ruled that the Trump Administration did not have adequate legal justification for shutting down the program. As such, the Administration violated the Administrative Practices Act. However, the judge also stated that the Department of Homeland Security could shutter the program in the future if it could offer a compelling and logical reason for doing so.
In Texas, another federal judge is hearing arguments on whether the DACA program is constitutional or whether President Obama exceeded his authority when he announced the program. Seven states, including Texas, are asking the judge to issue a preliminary injunction forcing the government to reject any DACA renewals.
The judge, Andrew Hanen, is best known for blocking an attempt to expand DACA in 2015, called DAPA. The Obama Administration had attempted to offer deferred status to certain undocumented immigrants who had been in the United States for a number of years and had children who were citizens or legal permanent residents. Legal experts assume that Judge Hanen does not believe that DACA is legal and will, therefore, order the injunction to prevent the Trump Administration from issuing renewals. This would set up a direct conflict with the District Court ruling in the District of Columbia.
Those hoping to apply for a DACA renewal should understand that this issue will not be resolved by district court judges. Instead, the government has already sought permission to appeal the decision of Judge Bates to the intermediate appellate court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Even the ruling from the judge in Texas might be appealed.
Once the Courts of Appeals rule, then the issue might end up in front of the Supreme Court—just as the Trump travel ban case did. How the Supreme Court will rule is anybody’s guess.
Unfortunately, there is no quick resolution to the DACA controversy, so those individuals who have received a deferment or are seeking deferment must live in a state of uncertainty. Fortunately, the attorneys at Kriezelman Burton & Associates are here to answer any questions that you have. We can guide you through the complicated immigration system and identify which path is best for you. To schedule a consultation with a Chicago DACA attorney, please call 312-332-2550 or send an online message.
5-Star Rating | Based on 200+ Satisfied Customer Google Reviews
Brittni Rivera and her team (Carina Lopez) are fantastic! They are responsive, efficient and beyond compassionate. Brittni Rivera and her team treated me with dignity and respect as they patiently answered all of my questions. They didn't move on without making sure I understood each step. Their work ethic was impressive. It felt like they were an extension of my personal team. I can't say enough to convey my gratitude…
I just want to say huge thank you to Mr. Kevin A. Raica. for everything he has done for me throughout my immigration case. When I first came to Kevin, he explained the SIJS process clearly and walked me through the steps. We first needed to get the guardianship court order before moving forward with the I-360, and he connected me with a trusted attorney to help with that part.…
I cannot find the words to express my gratitude to Brittni Rivera! She literally saved my family. We had been waiting seven years for what she accomplished in just three weeks. I was impressed by how accessible the office is—they always answer calls very quickly. A special thank you to paralegal Nataliia Melnyk. You are my heroes. Thank you.
We are incredibly grateful for the help and support we received from this office. From the very beginning, they understood the urgency of our situation and treated our case with real care, professionalism, and speed. They were extremely responsive, clear, and compassionate throughout the entire process. They moved quickly when timing was critical, kept us informed, and helped us navigate a very stressful immigration situation with confidence. Thanks to their…
We hoped and prayed for this day, not knowing if it would ever come. Deportations are incredibly scary and overwhelming. We wanted to give a very special thank you to Jennifer Peyton of Chicago for securing this victory for us! With Jennifer on our side we were able to get our loved one back. On behalf of our family, thank you. When we started this journey, we had hoped and…
Matthew Kriezelman, first of all, thank you very much; you and your team are the best immigration lawyers in Chicago. I had a great experience—your professionalism was outstanding, and you were always there whenever needed. I give you five stars for the wonderful work you and your team did. Thanks again.
Hay momentos en la vida en los que una familia siente que el mundo se detiene. Nosotros vivimos uno de esos momentos y, en medio de la incertidumbre y el miedo, tuvimos la fortuna de encontrar a la abogada Sheila McNulty y al paralegal Rafael RodrĂguez . Nos escucharon con empatĂa, nos guiaron con paciencia y defendieron nuestro caso con un profesionalismo, una dedicaciĂłn y una calidad humana realmente excepcionales.…
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.
NUVEW | Copyright 2026 All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | privacy policy