The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard arguments at the end of March in a case involving a man facing deportation after pleading guilty to a felony. Because of orders issued by President Trump in recent weeks, this case has taken on particular importance because of the potential increase in deportations pursued against immigrants who are accused of crimes.
Jae Lee came to the United States from South Korea with his family in 1982. He has never returned to his home country and has lived legally in the U.S. for 35 years. When he was charged with possession with intent to distribute ecstasy, his criminal defense attorney advised that pleading guilty to the charge would have no immigration consequences. His attorney, however, was not familiar with immigration laws or policies and failed to discuss the case with an experienced immigration attorney before providing the advice to his client. As a result of his guilty plea, Lee was placed in deportation proceedings and has been fighting to stop his deportation while in custody for seven years.
In 2010 SCOTUS held that the Constitution requires that immigrant defendants in criminal cases should be properly advised of the potential immigration consequences of a guilty plea. However, an appeals court found against Lee, stating he would have been convicted anyhow at trial, so the ineffective assistance of his counsel was harmless error. Lee argues that an effective attorney would have fought to negotiate a more favorable plea bargain that did not result in deportation. We will wait and see how SCOTUS decides this case.
In today’s current immigration landscape, a more favorable plea bargain may not even be a help to immigrants facing criminal charges. As part of the immigration-related executive orders issued by the new White House administration, the president ordered that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) adjust their definition of what criminal charges and convictions will make an immigrant a target for deportation.
Under the past administration, ICE was instructed to prioritize immigrants convicted of serious crimes as deportation targets. However, officials now have the latitude to substantially expand the definition and target many more individuals who are involved in the criminal process.
Now, anyone who is convicted of any type of criminal offense – even non-violent misdemeanors – will be considered a priority for deportation. Even people accused or suspected of crimes can be prioritized, even though they are considered innocent until proven guilty under the criminal justice process. Furthermore, the interpretation of “crime” may even extend to non-criminal violations.
Criminal defense attorneys representing immigrant clients may not always have a thorough understanding of the ever-changing immigration and deportation policies in the United States. It is essential for any immigrant facing any accusations to consult with a skilled Chicago immigration lawyer as soon as possible. Please call Kriezelman Burton & Associates today at 312-332-2550 for assistance.
5-Star Rating | Based on 200+ Satisfied Customer Google Reviews
Kevin Raica literally saved my life. He helped me out of a dangerous situation that my previous attorney had put me in. After 17 years without status and 6.5 years of working with my previous attorney, I had experienced so many denials that I had completely lost hope. When I met Kevin, everything changed. He genuinely cared about my situation and gave me hope when I couldn’t see any for…
We sincerely thank the entire team for the professionalism, responsiveness, patience, and dedication shown throughout our case. From our very first visit, Justin reassured us that everything would be all right. Thank you, Khiabett, for your expertise, professionalism, and calm guidance before and during the interview, which greatly reduced our stress and gave us confidence. We also deeply appreciate Kamila's hard work, patience, and responsiveness throughout the process. For sorting…
I would like to sincerely thank Attorney Justin Burton and PL Kamila Lada for support with my adjustment of status case. I have been working with the firm for over a year now, and I have received nothing short of exceptional services and support throughout various cases for myself and family members. Highly recommend consulting and retaining this firm.
We have been in the dark with our case for over 2 decades, while working with other big firms who just kept me in the dark and sat on our case without making any effort to move it forward until I met the wonderful team at Kriezelman & Burton. AO and JP are truly God-sent angels who with their knowledge, collaboration, sense of direction and outside the box thinking, managed…
Brittni Rivera and her team (Carina Lopez) are fantastic! They are responsive, efficient and beyond compassionate. Brittni Rivera and her team treated me with dignity and respect as they patiently answered all of my questions. They didn't move on without making sure I understood each step. Their work ethic was impressive. It felt like they were an extension of my personal team. I can't say enough to convey my gratitude…
We are incredibly grateful for the help and support we received from this office. From the very beginning, they understood the urgency of our situation and treated our case with real care, professionalism, and speed. They were extremely responsive, clear, and compassionate throughout the entire process. They moved quickly when timing was critical, kept us informed, and helped us navigate a very stressful immigration situation with confidence. Thanks to their…

Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.
NUVEW | Copyright 2026 All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | privacy policy