No case before the Supreme Court this term drew more attention than Trump v. Hawaii, the legal challenge to President Trump’s third travel ban. On June 26, 2018, the Justices finally released their decision, upholding the President’s ban. In a majority decision written by the Chief Justice, the Court found that President Trump’s power of immigration was expansive and that his latest travel ban fits comfortably within that power. Turning back both statutory and constitutional challenges, the Court nevertheless expressed some skepticism about Trump’s negative statements toward Muslims.
Relying on 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), President Trump on September 24, 2017, placed restrictions on the entry of citizens from eight countries, most of which were majority-Muslim. This third travel ban followed on the heels of two other bans, which courts had struck down and which either Trump withdrew or which expired. The third ban included countries such as North Korea, Chad, Libya, Venezuela, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.
Immediately challenged in court, the ban suffered the same fate as Trump’s earlier two bans, with courts finding it beyond his power or else an exercise of religious discrimination. The Trump administration then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard his argument on April 25, 2018.
Relying heavily on statutory text, the Supreme Court found that Congress had given the President the power to exclude “any class of aliens” from the United States provided that the President found their admission would be “detrimental” to the country’s interests. The Court’s majority waived aside arguments that Congress only intended to grant the President the power to act in emergencies and for a limited amount of time.
Furthermore, the Court found that the ban had a rational basis to advance the nation’s security, so it survived any First Amendment challenges. Because the ban dealt with immigration, the majority held that they would not engage in the searching standard of review normally used in First Amendment cases. As a result, the Court held that the ban was a proper exercise of the President’s authority.
Although President Trump won this case, many of the Justices went out of their way to chide or warn him that religious and other bigotry will not be tolerated. For example, the majority appeared to overrule its Korematsu decision from World War II, which upheld the internment of Japanese-Americans on national-security grounds. Furthermore, Justice Kennedy stated in his concurrence it was an “urgent necessity” that government officials like Trump recognize and respect the freedom of religion.
Perhaps the strongest rebuke to Trump came from Justice Sotomayor, writing in dissent. Calling President Trump’s anti-Muslim comments “harrowing,” she charged the majority with abandoning the nation’s “most sacred legal commitments” and stated that she would have struck down the travel ban.
With the ban in effect, those hoping to reunite with loved ones from affected countries will need to reassess their options. The same goes for corporations, businesses, and universities hoping to sponsor someone from one of the countries on Trump’s list.
Of course, President Trump could add to the list, revoke the ban, or institute a new one. As with so many things with this Presidency, unpredictability is the only constant.
For help with your immigration issue, please reach out to Kriezelman Burton & Associates today. Our experienced Chicago immigration lawyers stay abreast of current developments in the law and can identify our clients’ best options in a challenging legal environment. Please contact us today to schedule your consultation.
5-Star Rating | Based on 200+ Satisfied Customer Google Reviews
Exceptional Legal Representation I want to sincerely thank Kevin Raica for handling my case so efficiently. From our very first meeting, he demonstrated confidence and a clear plan for moving forward, which put us at ease right away. He kept the process moving and resolved our case in a timely manner. His professionalism and dedication made a stressful situation much easier to navigate. I have already recommended his services to…
Kriezelman Burton & Associate are Excellent immigration law firm that understands and guide one through any immigration cases. Attorney Khiabett is one of their best attorneys you can trust, she understands, patient, attentive, and gives honest advice about any immigration case her client has. I HIGHLY recommend the law firm to anyone having immigration concerns. Thank you for all you do.
Outstanding experience and successful Green Card approval with Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC! The immigration process can often be stressful and overwhelming, but working with Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC in Chicago made the entire journey smooth, transparent, and successful from start to finish. I want to express my deepest gratitude to Justin Burton for his exceptional professionalism, strategic guidance, and confidence from day one. Knowing my case was in…
Kevin Raica literally saved my life. He helped me out of a dangerous situation that my previous attorney had put me in. After 17 years without status and 6.5 years of working with my previous attorney, I had experienced so many denials that I had completely lost hope. When I met Kevin, everything changed. He genuinely cared about my situation and gave me hope when I couldn’t see any for…
We sincerely thank the entire team for the professionalism, responsiveness, patience, and dedication shown throughout our case. From our very first visit, Justin reassured us that everything would be all right. Thank you, Khiabett, for your expertise, professionalism, and calm guidance before and during the interview, which greatly reduced our stress and gave us confidence. We also deeply appreciate Kamila's hard work, patience, and responsiveness throughout the process. For sorting…
I would like to sincerely thank Attorney Justin Burton and PL Kamila Lada for support with my adjustment of status case. I have been working with the firm for over a year now, and I have received nothing short of exceptional services and support throughout various cases for myself and family members. Highly recommend consulting and retaining this firm.
We have been in the dark with our case for over 2 decades, while working with other big firms who just kept me in the dark and sat on our case without making any effort to move it forward until I met the wonderful team at Kriezelman & Burton. AO and JP are truly God-sent angels who with their knowledge, collaboration, sense of direction and outside the box thinking, managed…
Brittni Rivera and her team (Carina Lopez) are fantastic! They are responsive, efficient and beyond compassionate. Brittni Rivera and her team treated me with dignity and respect as they patiently answered all of my questions. They didn't move on without making sure I understood each step. Their work ethic was impressive. It felt like they were an extension of my personal team. I can't say enough to convey my gratitude…

Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.
NUVEW | Copyright 2026 All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | privacy policy