Talk To A Chicago Immigration Attorney
312-332-2550
How U.S. Law May Protect Immigrants Facing Torture in Their Native Countries
Looking for A Specific Post? Search Below
U.S. immigration law offers a number of avenues for individuals to seek protection from removal if they are facing certain types of imminent danger in their country of origin. The rules governing such protection claims are quite complicated, however, and you can not assume that simply informing the government of a threat to your life will be enough to let you stay in the country. This is why it is always essential to work with an experienced Chicago immigration lawyer when presenting any type of asylum or protection-based claim.
Chicago Appeals Court Denies Immigration Protection Based on Deceased Brother’s Torture by Guatemalan Gang
Recently the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which oversees immigration appeals from Chicago and throughout Illinois, rejected an application to defer removal in a case in which the petitioner claimed he would be subjected to torture in his native country. The United States is a signatory to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which prevents the federal government from returning or extraditing someone to any nation “where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.” Nevertheless, U.S. law affords immigration officials significant latitude in deciding who qualifies for protection under the Convention.
In this case, the petitioner was born in Guatemala. When he was 11 years old, the petitioner’s family relocated him to the United States, where he became a legal permanent resident. 15 years later, in 2016, the Department of Homeland Security sought to remove the petitioner from the country following his conviction on state drug charges in Illinois.
The petitioner asked to defer removal under the Convention Against Torture. Specifically, the petitioner alleged he would be subjected to torture by Guatemalan gangs if he were returned to that country. The petitioner cited the experiences of his brother, who was previously deported by the U.S. to Guatemala. According to the petitioner, a specific gang “regularly extorted” his brother for money because it perceived him to be a wealthy ex-American. The gang routinely kidnapped and beat the petitioner’s brother when he was unable to pay its demands. The gang also threatened retaliation against other family members, including the petitioner. The petitioner’s brother died in 2012.
Despite the petitioner’s testimony, an immigration judge denied his request for deferral. The judge determined the petitioner’s fears of torture were “speculative,” and that there was insufficient proof that local authorities would fail to protect him if he were returned to Guatemala. The Board of Immigration Appeals later upheld the judge’s decision, leading the petitioner to seek relief from the Seventh Circuit.
The Court of Appeals declined to reverse the decision of the immigration authorities. As the Court explained in its written decision, the specific regulation the petitioner sought protection under states a petitioner must provide evidence “that it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed.” In other words, the mere fact the petitioner’s brother was previously tortured did not prove the petitioner would also be tortured. Even the threats made to the brother about the petitioner were not specific enough, the Court said, to justify the petitioner’s request to remain in the United States.
Contact a Chicago Immigration Lawyer Today
Every immigration case is unique. The Chicago immigration attorneys at Kriezelman Burton & Associates understand this, which is why we strive to provide experienced, professional representation to individuals struggling to deal with the immigration system. Contact us today to schedule a consultation so we can sit down and learn more about your immigration problem.
Co Mówią Nasi Klienci
Ocena 5 gwiazdek | Na podstawie 200+ pozytywnych opinii na Google
I had a wonderful experience working with Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC. From start to finish, the team was professional, knowledgeable, and truly dedicated to guiding me through every step of the process. They made what could have been a stressful situation feel smooth and manageable, always answering questions quickly and keeping me updated. I especially want to thank Khabit for his outstanding support—he was patient, detail-oriented, and went above…
Many thanks to attorney Kevin A Raica and his assistant Rafael Rodriguez for all their help. My immigration case went very smoothly and quickly.
We worked with Kevin Raica from Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, and I can confidently say he went above and beyond for us. Our process was very long and at times overwhelming, but Kevin guided us every step of the way with professionalism, patience, and dedication. He was always available to answer our questions, explained everything clearly, and made sure we understood our options at each stage. What stood out…
A family friend referred me to work with Maya Flores at Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC to help me with my U.S. naturalization. Despite the current immigration tension, Maya helped make the process smooth and her familiarity with procedure helped ease my anxiety. She submitted the citizenship application on my behalf and let me know what to expect. I decided to retain her service for the civics interview as well,…
I really want to thank Justin and Kamila; they are the best. I waited almost 20 years and no one could help me get my green card and in 4 months they helped me get my permit, and I got my green card in less then 4 months. They are the best. I will always be grateful for what they did for me, thank you Justin and Kamila!!!!
I am writing this review to express my deepest gratitude for the hard work on our case by our Immigration Attorney, Lauren McClure and her Paralegal, Kamila Lada. My Green Card was approved! I know this wouldn't have been possible without their expertise and dedication. They both were extremely helpful, responsive, and guided us through every step of the way. Lauren took the time to train us for our interview…
I am incredibly grateful to Mr. Burton for his outstanding legal assistance in my immigration case, from my first consultation he heard me patiently demonstrating exceptional professionalism, expertise, and a genuine commitment to my case. Immigration process can be overwhelming and stressful, but he and his team provided clear guidance every step of the way, always answering my questions promptly and reassuring me with their deep expertise. Thanks to their…
I had an outstanding experience working with Brittni Rivera. From our very first consultation, she demonstrated deep expertise, professionalism, and genuine care for my case. Navigating immigration processes can be incredibly stressful, but Brittni made the entire journey much more manageable and transparent. She were always responsive to my questions, provided clear guidance at every step, and never made me feel like just another case. Thanks to her hard work…
Highly recommend this firm. I had the pleasure of working with Lauren McClure and she is absolutely the best. She was very helpful and walked me through every step of the process, she is patient and she got the job done. I am very grateful with her and her team for helping me with the process of my case. Thank you so much.
I have worked with Kevin Raica for my VAWA application. Let me tell you he has been AMAZING. Unlike other lawyers Kevin has always went above and beyond for me. Kevin is not in it for the money he is in it to HELP people and make a difference. He has walked me through the entire process and always answers any questions I have no matter what. This law firm…
Schedule a consultation!:
Umów się na konsultację!
Libertyville
Reklama prawnika. Informacje te mają wyłącznie charakter ogólny. Przedstawionych informacji nie należy interpretować jako formalnej porady prawnej ani tworzenia relacji prawnik/klient. Wcześniejsze wyniki i referencje nie stanowią gwarancji, rękojmi ani przewidywania wyniku Twojej sprawy i nie powinny być w ten sposób interpretowane. Wyniki z przeszłości nie mogą zagwarantować przyszłych wyników. Jakikolwiek wynik w pojedynczej sprawie nie ma na celu stworzenia oczekiwań podobnych wyników w przyszłych sprawach, ponieważ każdy przypadek wiąże się z wieloma różnymi czynnikami, dlatego też wyniki będą się różnić w każdym przypadku. Podając dane kontaktowe, użytkownicy potwierdzają i wyrażają wyraźną zgodę na kontakt za pośrednictwem udostępnionych metod komunikacji, w tym wiadomości SMS. Mogą obowiązywać stawki za wiadomości i transmisję danych. Częstotliwość wiadomości może się różnić. Odpowiedz STOP, aby zrezygnować.
NUVEW | Prawo autorskie 2025 Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone | Informacja o dostępności | polityka prywatności