Last week, in a groundbreaking ruling, the Board of Immigration Appeals finally recognized that a woman who has suffered domestic violence may be eligible for asylum.
Asylum is available for certain people who fear harm in their home countries. However, not every person who is afraid to return to their home country, or even every person who has been harmed in their home country, is eligible for asylum. There are very narrow and specific requirements that must be met. A person seeking asylum must demonstrate that he or she is unable to return to his or her home country because she has been persecuted (or has a well-founded fear of persecution) on account of her race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group, and that the home country’s government is unable or unwilling to protect that person. Each phrase of this definition has a specific legal meaning.
In 1999, a Guatemalan woman who had been severely abused by her husband applied for asylum. She is known by her initials, R.A. The Immigration Judge approved her application. However, the attorneys for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service disagreed with the judge’s decision and appealed. For almost 10 years, the case bounced back and forth between the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Attorney General’s office, with no ruling that other potential applicants could use as guidance, and no resolution to R.A.’s case. Finally, the application was sent back to the Immigration Judge. The parties agreed that R.A. was eligible for asylum. However, though R.A. was granted asylum, there was no court opinion issued that could be helpful to other potential applicants, or that could serve as guidance to other judges deciding applications.
Finally, on August 26, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedential opinion about a woman, also Guatemalan, who suffered domestic violence. The Board ruled that a woman who suffered domestic violence at the hands of her intimate partner may be eligible for asylum. Of course, it is not as simple as declaring, “I was abused,” or even as proving the abuse. This woman fit into a group of “married women who are unable to leave their relationship” which, for the first time, the Board held met the “social group” standard necessary for asylum. On the facts of that case, the Board also decided that she had proved that the abuse she suffered was severe enough that it could be called “persecution,” and that she was abused “on account of” her membership in that social group.
This ruling is significant because Immigration Judges here in Chicago and across the nation must now recognize that a battered and abused woman may have lawful and complete claim for asylum. Women who have fled their abusers in their home countries now have a recognized basis to seek protection here, through the asylum process.
The case is known as Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014).
–Update by Erin C. Cobb
Ocena 5 gwiazdek | Na podstawie 200+ pozytywnych opinii na Google
I cannot recommend Kevin Raica highly enough. He helped me successfully obtain my U.S. green card, and the entire process was smooth and stress-free because of his expertise and dedication. From start to finish, Kevin was professional, organized, and extremely knowledgeable about immigration law. He made sure every document was prepared correctly and took the time to explain each step clearly. Anytime I had questions, he responded promptly and made…
We contacted Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, based on a recommendation, when my wife was detained by ICE. Attorney Khiabett Osuna handled our case, and it turned out to be the right choice. From the very beginning, she proved herself to be a caring and competent professional, clearly explaining the process. You can tell she's truly invested in each case and achieving results for her clients. We've also heard of…
I would like to express my gratitude to Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, and especially to attorney Khiabett Osuna, who handled my case. I contacted them based on a recommendation and have never regretted it. From the very beginning, she demonstrated high professionalism. I could tell she was genuinely committed to the outcome and was doing everything possible to protect her client.
I highly recommend Brittni Rivera. We are very grateful to her and the entire team at Kriezelman Burton & Associates. Your dedication, responsiveness, and compassion made an enormous difference during an incredibly difficult time. Serving as the liaison between Brittni Rivera and our friend in ICE detention, I saw firsthand how tirelessly she worked guiding us through the process, answering every question, and never losing sight of the humanity at…
Andrea C. Ochoa is truly the best of the best. ❤️ Our family went through one of the most difficult and frightening experiences of our lives when Feruz was detained by ICE. We felt lost, scared, and unsure of what would happen next. From the very beginning, Andrea brought us not only her professionalism and deep legal knowledge, but also something even more important — hope. She guided us through…
In the final stages of our employment based green card, Maya Flores was very helpful. She guided us through the details, made a mock up interview and then went with us to the actual appointment. We were able to see her expertise because she made some clarifications to the officer. Very good service, 5 well deserved stars.
Reklama prawnika. Informacje te mają wyłącznie charakter ogólny. Przedstawionych informacji nie należy interpretować jako formalnej porady prawnej ani tworzenia relacji prawnik/klient. Wcześniejsze wyniki i referencje nie stanowią gwarancji, rękojmi ani przewidywania wyniku Twojej sprawy i nie powinny być w ten sposób interpretowane. Wyniki z przeszłości nie mogą zagwarantować przyszłych wyników. Jakikolwiek wynik w pojedynczej sprawie nie ma na celu stworzenia oczekiwań podobnych wyników w przyszłych sprawach, ponieważ każdy przypadek wiąże się z wieloma różnymi czynnikami, dlatego też wyniki będą się różnić w każdym przypadku. Podając dane kontaktowe, użytkownicy potwierdzają i wyrażają wyraźną zgodę na kontakt za pośrednictwem udostępnionych metod komunikacji, w tym wiadomości SMS. Mogą obowiązywać stawki za wiadomości i transmisję danych. Częstotliwość wiadomości może się różnić. Odpowiedz STOP, aby zrezygnować.
NUVEW | Prawo autorskie 2026 Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone | Informacja o dostępności | polityka prywatności