Last week, in a groundbreaking ruling, the Board of Immigration Appeals finally recognized that a woman who has suffered domestic violence may be eligible for asylum.
Asylum is available for certain people who fear harm in their home countries. However, not every person who is afraid to return to their home country, or even every person who has been harmed in their home country, is eligible for asylum. There are very narrow and specific requirements that must be met. A person seeking asylum must demonstrate that he or she is unable to return to his or her home country because she has been persecuted (or has a well-founded fear of persecution) on account of her race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group, and that the home country’s government is unable or unwilling to protect that person. Each phrase of this definition has a specific legal meaning.
In 1999, a Guatemalan woman who had been severely abused by her husband applied for asylum. She is known by her initials, R.A. The Immigration Judge approved her application. However, the attorneys for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service disagreed with the judge’s decision and appealed. For almost 10 years, the case bounced back and forth between the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Attorney General’s office, with no ruling that other potential applicants could use as guidance, and no resolution to R.A.’s case. Finally, the application was sent back to the Immigration Judge. The parties agreed that R.A. was eligible for asylum. However, though R.A. was granted asylum, there was no court opinion issued that could be helpful to other potential applicants, or that could serve as guidance to other judges deciding applications.
Finally, on August 26, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedential opinion about a woman, also Guatemalan, who suffered domestic violence. The Board ruled that a woman who suffered domestic violence at the hands of her intimate partner may be eligible for asylum. Of course, it is not as simple as declaring, “I was abused,” or even as proving the abuse. This woman fit into a group of “married women who are unable to leave their relationship” which, for the first time, the Board held met the “social group” standard necessary for asylum. On the facts of that case, the Board also decided that she had proved that the abuse she suffered was severe enough that it could be called “persecution,” and that she was abused “on account of” her membership in that social group.
This ruling is significant because Immigration Judges here in Chicago and across the nation must now recognize that a battered and abused woman may have lawful and complete claim for asylum. Women who have fled their abusers in their home countries now have a recognized basis to seek protection here, through the asylum process.
The case is known as Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014).
–Update by Erin C. Cobb
Ocena 5 gwiazdek | Na podstawie 200+ pozytywnych opinii na Google
I would like to sincerely thank Attorney Justin Burton and PL Kamila Lada for support with my adjustment of status case. I have been working with the firm for over a year now, and I have received nothing short of exceptional services and support throughout various cases for myself and family members. Highly recommend consulting and retaining this firm.
We have been in the dark with our case for over 2 decades, while working with other big firms who just kept me in the dark and sat on our case without making any effort to move it forward until I met the wonderful team at Kriezelman & Burton. AO and JP are truly God-sent angels who with their knowledge, collaboration, sense of direction and outside the box thinking, managed…
Brittni Rivera and her team (Carina Lopez) are fantastic! They are responsive, efficient and beyond compassionate. Brittni Rivera and her team treated me with dignity and respect as they patiently answered all of my questions. They didn't move on without making sure I understood each step. Their work ethic was impressive. It felt like they were an extension of my personal team. I can't say enough to convey my gratitude…
I’m deeply grateful to God for leading us to this law firm; it is a true blessing to work with such professional and passionate individuals. Their dedication and commitment help make a difficult situation far less traumatic. In our case, we received 100% support from Attorney Andrea Ochoa and paralegal Rafael. May God bless them and allow them to continue this wonderful work. Thank you—a thousand thanks.
I give my total recommendation and trust in this great organization that has supported me and my family in very difficult times, especially the lawyer Andrea Ochoa and her paralegal Rafael who were little angels that God has sent us to be able to face all the obstacles that we have had along the way. Thank you very much with all my heart. ❤️
I have heard from several people that Brittni is a great attorney. When my friend was detained, I recommended Brittni to take his case. She did an amazing job putting together all the necessary information, especially given that we had only a couple of days to submit the habeas corpus application. She and her team worked very professionally and provided clear guidance throughout. She stayed in touch consistently and was…
I decided to use the services of Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, and Kevin was nothing short of professional and amazing. From the consultation to the final approval, he gave us confidence and reassurance throughout the entire process. When I first told him about my wife’s wish to change her status, the first thing he said was, “We will get it done.” Even during the USCIS pause, he continued to…
Reklama prawnika. Informacje te mają wyłącznie charakter ogólny. Przedstawionych informacji nie należy interpretować jako formalnej porady prawnej ani tworzenia relacji prawnik/klient. Wcześniejsze wyniki i referencje nie stanowią gwarancji, rękojmi ani przewidywania wyniku Twojej sprawy i nie powinny być w ten sposób interpretowane. Wyniki z przeszłości nie mogą zagwarantować przyszłych wyników. Jakikolwiek wynik w pojedynczej sprawie nie ma na celu stworzenia oczekiwań podobnych wyników w przyszłych sprawach, ponieważ każdy przypadek wiąże się z wieloma różnymi czynnikami, dlatego też wyniki będą się różnić w każdym przypadku. Podając dane kontaktowe, użytkownicy potwierdzają i wyrażają wyraźną zgodę na kontakt za pośrednictwem udostępnionych metod komunikacji, w tym wiadomości SMS. Mogą obowiązywać stawki za wiadomości i transmisję danych. Częstotliwość wiadomości może się różnić. Odpowiedz STOP, aby zrezygnować.
NUVEW | Prawo autorskie 2026 Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone | Informacja o dostępności | polityka prywatności