Last week, in a groundbreaking ruling, the Board of Immigration Appeals finally recognized that a woman who has suffered domestic violence may be eligible for asylum.
Asylum is available for certain people who fear harm in their home countries. However, not every person who is afraid to return to their home country, or even every person who has been harmed in their home country, is eligible for asylum. There are very narrow and specific requirements that must be met. A person seeking asylum must demonstrate that he or she is unable to return to his or her home country because she has been persecuted (or has a well-founded fear of persecution) on account of her race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group, and that the home country’s government is unable or unwilling to protect that person. Each phrase of this definition has a specific legal meaning.
In 1999, a Guatemalan woman who had been severely abused by her husband applied for asylum. She is known by her initials, R.A. The Immigration Judge approved her application. However, the attorneys for the former Immigration and Naturalization Service disagreed with the judge’s decision and appealed. For almost 10 years, the case bounced back and forth between the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Attorney General’s office, with no ruling that other potential applicants could use as guidance, and no resolution to R.A.’s case. Finally, the application was sent back to the Immigration Judge. The parties agreed that R.A. was eligible for asylum. However, though R.A. was granted asylum, there was no court opinion issued that could be helpful to other potential applicants, or that could serve as guidance to other judges deciding applications.
Finally, on August 26, 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedential opinion about a woman, also Guatemalan, who suffered domestic violence. The Board ruled that a woman who suffered domestic violence at the hands of her intimate partner may be eligible for asylum. Of course, it is not as simple as declaring, “I was abused,” or even as proving the abuse. This woman fit into a group of “married women who are unable to leave their relationship” which, for the first time, the Board held met the “social group” standard necessary for asylum. On the facts of that case, the Board also decided that she had proved that the abuse she suffered was severe enough that it could be called “persecution,” and that she was abused “on account of” her membership in that social group.
This ruling is significant because Immigration Judges here in Chicago and across the nation must now recognize that a battered and abused woman may have lawful and complete claim for asylum. Women who have fled their abusers in their home countries now have a recognized basis to seek protection here, through the asylum process.
The case is known as Matter of A-R-C-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014).
–Update by Erin C. Cobb
Ocena 5 gwiazdek | Na podstawie 200+ pozytywnych opinii na Google
Brittni Rivera and her team (Carina Lopez) are fantastic! They are responsive, efficient and beyond compassionate. Brittni Rivera and her team treated me with dignity and respect as they patiently answered all of my questions. They didn't move on without making sure I understood each step. Their work ethic was impressive. It felt like they were an extension of my personal team. I can't say enough to convey my gratitude…
Our experience with the firm was extraordinary. We worked with attorney Andrea Ochoa. Since the very first meeting we met, Andrea gave us all the confidence to proceed with our case. She always answered our questions shortly and offered clear guidelines to proceed. When my son's case received a notice of intent to deny, she planned how to fight that decision effectively. We totally recommend everyone to trust their case…
I just want to say huge thank you to Mr. Kevin A. Raica. for everything he has done for me throughout my immigration case. When I first came to Kevin, he explained the SIJS process clearly and walked me through the steps. We first needed to get the guardianship court order before moving forward with the I-360, and he connected me with a trusted attorney to help with that part.…
I cannot find the words to express my gratitude to Brittni Rivera! She literally saved my family. We had been waiting seven years for what she accomplished in just three weeks. I was impressed by how accessible the office is—they always answer calls very quickly. A special thank you to paralegal Nataliia Melnyk. You are my heroes. Thank you.
We are incredibly grateful for the help and support we received from this office. From the very beginning, they understood the urgency of our situation and treated our case with real care, professionalism, and speed. They were extremely responsive, clear, and compassionate throughout the entire process. They moved quickly when timing was critical, kept us informed, and helped us navigate a very stressful immigration situation with confidence. Thanks to their…
Reklama prawnika. Informacje te mają wyłącznie charakter ogólny. Przedstawionych informacji nie należy interpretować jako formalnej porady prawnej ani tworzenia relacji prawnik/klient. Wcześniejsze wyniki i referencje nie stanowią gwarancji, rękojmi ani przewidywania wyniku Twojej sprawy i nie powinny być w ten sposób interpretowane. Wyniki z przeszłości nie mogą zagwarantować przyszłych wyników. Jakikolwiek wynik w pojedynczej sprawie nie ma na celu stworzenia oczekiwań podobnych wyników w przyszłych sprawach, ponieważ każdy przypadek wiąże się z wieloma różnymi czynnikami, dlatego też wyniki będą się różnić w każdym przypadku. Podając dane kontaktowe, użytkownicy potwierdzają i wyrażają wyraźną zgodę na kontakt za pośrednictwem udostępnionych metod komunikacji, w tym wiadomości SMS. Mogą obowiązywać stawki za wiadomości i transmisję danych. Częstotliwość wiadomości może się różnić. Odpowiedz STOP, aby zrezygnować.
NUVEW | Prawo autorskie 2026 Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone | Informacja o dostępności | polityka prywatności