The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program continues to be in a state of flux. Announced in 2012 by President Obama, the policy grants a deferral from deportation for two years to some immigrants who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children. After two years, recipients can seek a renewal provided they have no serious misdemeanors or felonies. To date, the program has protected around 700,000 people from deportation. However, two recent court cases have rendered the future of DACA less clear.
Just last week, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. ordered that the Trump administration cannot close down the DACA program. Going even farther, the judge ordered that the government begin accepting new DACA applicants.
Judge John Bates ruled that the Trump Administration did not have adequate legal justification for shutting down the program. As such, the Administration violated the Administrative Practices Act. However, the judge also stated that the Department of Homeland Security could shutter the program in the future if it could offer a compelling and logical reason for doing so.
In Texas, another federal judge is hearing arguments on whether the DACA program is constitutional or whether President Obama exceeded his authority when he announced the program. Seven states, including Texas, are asking the judge to issue a preliminary injunction forcing the government to reject any DACA renewals.
The judge, Andrew Hanen, is best known for blocking an attempt to expand DACA in 2015, called DAPA. The Obama Administration had attempted to offer deferred status to certain undocumented immigrants who had been in the United States for a number of years and had children who were citizens or legal permanent residents. Legal experts assume that Judge Hanen does not believe that DACA is legal and will, therefore, order the injunction to prevent the Trump Administration from issuing renewals. This would set up a direct conflict with the District Court ruling in the District of Columbia.
Those hoping to apply for a DACA renewal should understand that this issue will not be resolved by district court judges. Instead, the government has already sought permission to appeal the decision of Judge Bates to the intermediate appellate court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Even the ruling from the judge in Texas might be appealed.
Once the Courts of Appeals rule, then the issue might end up in front of the Supreme Court—just as the Trump travel ban case did. How the Supreme Court will rule is anybody’s guess.
Unfortunately, there is no quick resolution to the DACA controversy, so those individuals who have received a deferment or are seeking deferment must live in a state of uncertainty. Fortunately, the attorneys at Kriezelman Burton & Associates are here to answer any questions that you have. We can guide you through the complicated immigration system and identify which path is best for you. To schedule a consultation with a Chicago DACA attorney, please call 312-332-2550 or send an online message.
5-Star Rating | Based on 200+ Satisfied Customer Google Reviews
My aunt was recently detained by ICE and sent to El Paso, Texas to the East Montana Detention Facility. This place is essentially a prison in the middle of the desert, and the majority of the detainees here get deported. My family and I interviewed a dozen immigration attorneys around the country to help my aunt, and we decided to hire Kevin Raica, an attorney with Kriezelman Burton and Associates.…
Our case was very difficult, and at times it felt like there was no way out. My wife was detained for a long period of time, and it was an extremely challenging experience for our family. Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC truly changed our situation. I would especially like to thank our attorney, Brittni Rivera, as well as Natalia. They were attentive, honest, and always ready to help. It was…
I cannot recommend Kevin Raica highly enough. He helped me successfully obtain my U.S. green card, and the entire process was smooth and stress-free because of his expertise and dedication. From start to finish, Kevin was professional, organized, and extremely knowledgeable about immigration law. He made sure every document was prepared correctly and took the time to explain each step clearly. Anytime I had questions, he responded promptly and made…
We contacted Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, based on a recommendation, when my wife was detained by ICE. Attorney Khiabett Osuna handled our case, and it turned out to be the right choice. From the very beginning, she proved herself to be a caring and competent professional, clearly explaining the process. You can tell she's truly invested in each case and achieving results for her clients. We've also heard of…
I would like to express my gratitude to Kriezelman Burton & Associates, LLC, and especially to attorney Khiabett Osuna, who handled my case. I contacted them based on a recommendation and have never regretted it. From the very beginning, she demonstrated high professionalism. I could tell she was genuinely committed to the outcome and was doing everything possible to protect her client.
I highly recommend Brittni Rivera. We are very grateful to her and the entire team at Kriezelman Burton & Associates. Your dedication, responsiveness, and compassion made an enormous difference during an incredibly difficult time. Serving as the liaison between Brittni Rivera and our friend in ICE detention, I saw firsthand how tirelessly she worked guiding us through the process, answering every question, and never losing sight of the humanity at…
Andrea C. Ochoa is truly the best of the best. ❤️ Our family went through one of the most difficult and frightening experiences of our lives when Feruz was detained by ICE. We felt lost, scared, and unsure of what would happen next. From the very beginning, Andrea brought us not only her professionalism and deep legal knowledge, but also something even more important — hope. She guided us through…
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing contact information, users acknowledge and give explicit consent to be contacted via the methods of communication provided, including SMS. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP to opt out.
NUVEW | Copyright 2026 All Rights Reserved | Accessibility Notice | privacy policy